1
0.0

关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过

导演:
居伊·德波
主演:
未知
别名:
未知
0.0
1人评分
法语
语言
未知
上映时间
未知
片长
简介:
Voice 1 (male "professional announcer" type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.  These people also scorned "subjective profundity". They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.  Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole "” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...  Voice 2: "Our life is a journey "” In the winter and the night. "” We seek our passage..."�  Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.  Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.  Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.  Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.  Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.  Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment "ordinary life"� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.  Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.  Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.  Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.  Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.  Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.  Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?  Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.  Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.  Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.  Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation "” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.  Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.  Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

暂无片源

正在加载…

正在加载…

猜你喜欢
换一换
井冈山1993
1
0.0
井冈山1993
0.0
更新时间:08月12日
主演:王震,王之夏,张辛元,洪涛,许森涛
简介:1927年秋收起义失败后,毛泽东率工农革命军第一军第一师向南转移,途中遭到敌人的袭击,部队损失惨重。随后在决定部队去向的问题上,领导内部产生了很大分歧,最后毛泽东的意见得到大多数同志的支持,部队继续向南转移。到达永新县三湾村后,毛泽东对剩余部队进行了及时的改编,确立了党对军队的绝对领导。为建立巩固的革命根据地,扩大革命队伍,毛泽东提出应争取袁文才和王佐等地方武装势力。在此问题上,余洒度等第一批黄埔军校毕业的军官又与毛泽东产生了分歧,余洒度等人以去省里汇报为名逃离井冈山。毛泽东以诚相待,终于取得了袁文才的信任,毛泽东的部队驻进了茅坪,毛泽东由此找到了知音贺子珍。为进一步巩固革命根据地,毛泽东一方面继续争取王佐,一方面派何长工去省委汇报,寻找南昌起义失败后南下的朱德部队。很快王佐接受改编,加入了工人农革命军,壮大的队伍初战告捷一举拿下了新城。但在此时,省特派员周修明却责令部队改路去支援湖南暴动,还错误地传达省委指示,开除了毛泽东的党籍。不得已,毛泽东一面去中央申诉,一面出兵湖南。结果,军队遭到惨痛的失败,也丢掉了后方的根据地。毛泽东气愤不已,再次回到井冈山,经过浴血奋战,毛泽东与朱德的部队终于1928年4月28日在井冈山胜利会师。
0
1993
井冈山1993
主演:王震,王之夏,张辛元,洪涛,许森涛
海阔天空1958
2
0.0
海阔天空1958
0.0
更新时间:08月12日
主演:刘江,邢吉田,赵学民,田平,王润身,赵松,王心刚
简介:《喜出望外》编剧:林荫梧、单文;演员:赵擎民(李振海)周刍(何科长)刘江(高科长)陈播(副司令员)邢吉田(刘部长)王润身(炊事员)田平(舰政委)黄意麟(文工团员) 。某渔业生产合作社主任李振海,到沿海某城为渔业生产合作社订造十艘机帆船。因为大家都在跃进,生产任务已排满。后来他来到自己曾服过役的舰上,看到战友们冲天干劲,军舰由自己修,开展了快速除锈法,他很感动,也投入了劳动。在劳动中遇到了修理部刘部长,刘部长介绍他去海军造船厂解决造船问题。他来到造船厂,可惜任务已排到年底,无法满足他的要求。正在这时水兵们提出军舰中修不进厂的口号,这大大减轻了造船厂的任务,因而也就能拿出人力、物力满足李振海的订货任务。当他得知这个消息时,喜出望外。  《天空的主人》编剧:杨肇林、艾杨;演员:王毅(辛志滔)魏良炎(刘新元)赵松(刘大爷)陈瑶(政委)郭宪忠(徐甫生)龙佃(王中玉)。海军航空兵某机场气象预报员辛志滔能够把书本理论和实际经验结合起来,研究本地本场上空的天气变化情况,并虚心向老渔民刘大爷学习,用土洋结合的方法预报天气。而刘新元是个死啃书本的预报员,在事实面前,在辛志滔的先进方法影响下,终于完成了准确的气象预报任务,保证了飞行。蒋匪空军驾驶RB--57型侦察机利用高空飞行的性能,搔扰我领空,在我空军地勤人员的保障下,我军飞行员英勇机智地战斗,终于在15000米以上的高空打下了敌机,成了在气象上、飞行上掌握天空的真正主人。  《集体的荣誉》编剧:艾杨、单文;演员:王心刚(赵玉林)罗正培(廖吉昌)刘秉章(舰长)哈予刚(汪益群)吴希嘏(舰政委)李春华(枪炮长)。在大跃进形势鼓舞下,海军某舰舰长提出海上射击达75%优秀的指标。舰上前主炮旋回手赵玉林敢想敢干,热烈响应舰长这个口号。有点保守思想的枪炮长认为指标太高,因为训练时间太短,新手太多。以舰政委为中心的先进派与他展开了斗争。水兵们日以继夜地勤学苦练,终于在第一次打海上拖靶时打了个满堂红优秀成绩。在正式打靶前夕,赵玉林病倒了,新换上来的旋回手汪益群也是干劲十足,他学习了赵玉林的钻研精神。赵玉林在病中还坚持参加了献宝会,把自己的经验告诉给汪益群,并提出全能手的倡议,这样在战斗中好手缺员就不会哑了一门炮,影响战斗力。这个倡议得到了首长和水兵的热烈支持。正式射击了,汪益群打了个满堂红优秀,整个舰队的海上射击达到了百分之百的优秀,支队首长祝贺了他们的胜利。他们乘胜前进,向以全能手为中心的新的海上训练任务前进。
0
1958
海阔天空1958
主演:刘江,邢吉田,赵学民,田平,王润身,赵松,王心刚
欧洲的某个地方
0
0.0
欧洲的某个地方
0.0
更新时间:08月12日
主演:Artúr Somlay,Miklós Gábor,Zsuzsa Bánki
简介:Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.  To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.  At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.  Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
0
1948
欧洲的某个地方
主演:Artúr Somlay,Miklós Gábor,Zsuzsa Bánki
首页
电影
剧集
动漫
综艺